Perspicacity

We're thinking partners for top global CCOs.

is greater

than capacity

Group 2
Explore our approach

Thinking 10 steps ahead requires systems

Image of Comms Leader's daily tasks with AI task highlighted

A boutique learning company de-risking & optimizing investments in comms.

Piar is the thinking partner that global Chief Communications Officers (CCOs) are already looking for. CCOs with a growth-mindset, smart enough to know the power of having the right outside perspective.

Within the management function of the business, CCOs are the closest linked to being responsible for understanding the impact of changes in the outside environment, and help the company stay in touch. They're expected to be strategic advisors who can anticipate outcomes, weigh evidence, challenge leadership, and defend their thinking under pressure. But most were trained in communications, not strategic analysis.

Piar provides the thinking partner and decision frameworks that fill that gap—helping you arrive at either a defensive or attacking recommendation with logic that survives scrutiny.

We don't tell you what to do. We help you think through what you haven't solved yet.

We help CCOs integrate these systems

Correlation ≠ causation. The external forces, headwinds, and tailwinds which have profound effects on the business can and should be measured. Piar's systems of lenses, frameworks, tools & methodologies make this achievable for CCOs.

The CCO's ability to articulate the impact of communications efforts on the business is a top concern of the c-suite. Most CCOs believe they're covered, until they're confronted by scrutiny with questions like: "How can you prove the lift can be attributed to communications?", and "What else could potentially explain this?". Leading dashboards, decks, and custom scorecards to obsolescence.

By applying causal thinking frameworks, reasoning methodologies, and advanced assessment techniques—we help CCOs go beyond ROI, to quantifying the multiplier effect of comms activities on growth.

Ultimately this positions communications as irreplaceable for building confidence & trust.

Systems are clusters of intuitive lenses

Between internal & external stakeholder management, communications strategy, crisis & reputation management—CCOs don't get enough time for thinking deeply. Piar is the thinking partner they've been looking for.

Icon representing Targeted InterventionsIcon representing Behavioral ChangeIcon representing Capacity Building

After spending the past seven years years in measurement & evaluation of communications, and working with some of the largest brands in the world—we observed the need for CCOs to elevate the critical thinking component of their role. Their drive to constantly evolve, adapt & learn, is what inspired our innovative approach to compliment their new capabilities in the AI-Age.

By providing a catalogue of multiple analytical lenses to look at their decision-making through, CCOs and their teams gain an enormous advantage that otherwise was unlikely due to a lack of centralization. Here are a few examples:

• The bias lens
• The stakeholder lens
• The counterfactual lens
• The scenario lens
• The evidence lens
• The comparison lens

CCOs—The output isn't a recommendation from us, it's a recommendation from you—stress-tested, assumption-documented, counter-arguments pre-addressed. You walk into the boardroom knowing your logic holds.

After spending the past seven years years in measurement & evaluation of communications, and working with some of the largest brands in the world—we observed the need for CCOs to elevate the critical thinking component of their role. Their drive to constantly evolve, adapt & learn, is what inspired our innovative approach to compliment their new capabilities in the AI-Age.

By providing multiple analytical lenses to look at their decision-making through, CCOs and their teams gain an enormous advantage that otherwise was unlikely due to a lack of centralization.

• The bias lens
• The stakeholder lens
• The counterfactual lens
• The scenario lens
• The evidence lens
• The comparison lens

CCOs—The output isn't a recommendation from us, it's a recommendation from you—stress-tested, assumption-documented, counter-arguments pre-addressed. You walk into the boardroom knowing your logic holds.

Image of Comms Leader presenting in boardroom with options of helpful areas Piar's training helps with

The behavioral science lens

When we explore beneath the surface-level blockers to change—fear, self-doubt, and honest mistakes—we arrive at illusive cognitive gaps which can be explained using behavioral science (BehSci).

• Awareness of risks that others miss.
• Deeply nurture your professional skepticism.
• Call-out events using BehSci terms.

Pre-seeding Exercise ⟶ 20 minutes: Prompt your AI-copilot to explain these biases: ▫ Authority bias ▫ Confirmation bias ▫ Availability heuristic ▫ Groupthink ▫ Anchoring ▫ Recency effect ▫ Survivorship bias ▫ Framing effects ▫ Loss aversion ▫ Social proof.

Image of PR & Comms leader in meeting, with caption showing she's noticing her colleague's biases because of her training with Piar
Behavioral science provides an important lens to understand the psychological phenomena that occur when CCOs interact with both internal colleagues & external stakeholders.

Whether it's in the form of an idea brought forth by a team member, or an initiative expressed by the executive committee—unconscious & structural biases permeate human thinking. Being aware of these biases, effects, fallacies & paradoxes enriches your team, and helps cut through noise to find vital signals.

BehSci explains forces that appear in communications planning, ideation, execution, and reporting—across all activities and outputs.

Part of our ethos is being epic. So we're going to reverse engineer the Top 5 desired impact we strive to have on your life as a communications leader.

**Please reach out to us after the session so we can high-five you when you experience any of the following changes:
 
• Better sleep during crisis periods because response patterns hold up
• Communication strategies that survive contact with reality, and thrive
• Promotions, recognition, confidence & trust both recieved and created
• Elevating the profile of PR & Comms within your organization

Ask a behavioral scientist

ask question img
After you've tried the above pre-seeding exercise in your own context, it's common to have questions for an expert.
Your question will be directed to Piar's global network of behavioral scientists. Common questions include validating simulations created using LLMs, interpreting mixed-motive scenarios, and industry specific, real-world observations.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Piar is the thinking partner CCOs need
Applying multiple analytical lenses to important CCO decisions

Five familiar lenses

e
time redtime black

01

Time Pressure

gap redgap black

02

Information Gaps

priority redpriority black

03

Competing Priorities

04

Context Changes

context redcontext black
context redcontext black

04

Context Shifts

05

Reputation Stakes

trust redtrust black
Group 1000003276
These five lenses are ubiquitous in communications. You know them already as realities, forces, and factors to always consider. You already use them to navigate decision making. The analytical lenses we bring to the table work in exactly the same way.
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right
CORRELATION ≠ CAUSATION
arrow right

Honest self-reflection

When was the last time you questioned whether a decision you were confident about might actually be wrong?

If you have a specific example in mind, can recall a moment of doubt, a post-mortem, or a time you changed course after reflection—that signals intellectual humility and openness to examining assumptions.

How do you currently defend your strategic recommendations when the CFO or CEO pushes back?

If you express a sense of frustration with the gap between correlation and causation in your evidence, mention wishing you had better frameworks, or that you rely on intuition more than you'd like—that signals awareness of the problem we can help you solve.

If we spent three hours stress-testing a real decision you're facing right now, what would you bring to the table?

If you immediately have something like a campaign launch, crisis scenario, a measurement challenge, or stakeholder conflict, and you find yourself leaning in a bit—that signals you have live challenges and want to work to solve them, not just learn theory.

Now you're ready for frameworks

clients arrow
You've become acquainted with systems. You've also learned more about lenses. Next, we'll explore inter-disciplinary frameworks—and workshop format.
→ Discover frameworks
Group svg

Planting ideas that grow

To optimize the effectiveness of an upcoming workshop—CCOs use these artifacts to pre-seed their team with ideas that blossom later.

Order vs Chaos

Spot where too much process is holding your team back from spontaneous ideas.

Construal Level Theory

Switch quickly between details and strategy when conversations get stuck on one level.

Pattern Disruption + Reframing

Start meetings with something unexpected to jolt attention and spark better discussion

The "AHA" Moment

Pause deliberately so your team gets more insights, not just endless talk.

Emotional Reasoning

Catch decisions driven by gut feelings before they derail your plans.

Metacognition

Check how you reached a conclusion before committing to a message or action.

Authority Bias - Stakeholder Mgt.

Surface quieter voices so meetings don’t default to whoever’s paid most.
Group 2
Group 2
Unlock this free resource by filling in your contact details
icon-star red
icon-star red
icon-star red
Thanks for downloading this asset, we're happy to walk you through how to best implement it in your role in PR & Comms.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Request a discovery call

Once you're officially connected, most CCOs will complete their first team workshop within a period of 90 days.

01
What’s your name
02
Type your email
03
Your company name
04
What’s your phone number
05
What to bring: one recent challenge, a stakeholder question, or a decision you are second-guessing
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.